-
January 22nd, 2002, 04:06 AM
#11
TastinGood
Guest
<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by SHATOUSHKA:
hypothetically, right?
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Of course.
------------------
"The library is selling books? If I don't want them for free then why would I want to pay for them?" Homer Simpson
-
February 17th, 2002, 01:02 AM
#12
Inactive Member
bringing this back,
if shatsy were married, she would be the one to dominate the relationship
------------------
PostModern Pollution
-
February 17th, 2002, 01:53 AM
#13
HB Forum Moderator
But would the man not be happy that it was this way?
------------------
Alex
-
February 17th, 2002, 05:40 AM
#14
HB Forum Owner
they say that he whom sleeps on the right side of the bed dominates the relationship.
i assume that such a situation would occur subliminally.
they also say that the one whom dominates a relationship is the one whom is less interested.
go figure.
------------------
~~share some greased tea with me~~
General Philosophy
Discuss This...
The Acropolis
-
February 17th, 2002, 08:55 PM
#15
Inactive Member
so to have a balanced relationship one only has to make sure none is sleeping on the right? I bet there are some nice solutions to that problem 
------------------
Sure the universe is a great place, but if it wasn't here, no-one would miss it.
-
February 17th, 2002, 09:22 PM
#16
Inactive Member
the one who dominates is the one who's less interested?
............INTERESTING
I can see how that would work hypothetically as if you're casually nonchalant as to the future of your relationship, you actually wield more power in an indirect way because you're not as desperate as your partner for it to work and so your partner is willing to accomodate you on various issues.
....................MAYBE
------------------
PostModern Pollution
-
February 18th, 2002, 12:39 AM
#17
HB Forum Owner
shatoushka's rule of thumb for those seeking to maintain a balance of dominance in a given relationship:
invest in bunk beds
------------------
~~share some greased tea with me~~
General Philosophy
Discuss This...
The Acropolis
-
February 18th, 2002, 12:55 AM
#18
HB Forum Moderator
Who's on top?
------------------
Alex
-
February 18th, 2002, 06:38 AM
#19
Inactive Member
they take turns.
one week, shats,
next week, her partner,
third week, their dog/cat/pet,
...don't want to disrupt the power politics of the household thereby both party recognise the need of having the pet included in this senario.
------------------
PostModern Pollution
-
February 18th, 2002, 07:42 AM
#20
HB Forum Owner
OOOOOOH! now it makes sense....
you guys were including me into the bunk bed scenario...
i was just thinking of the man and the pets.
good thing we cleared that up!
------------------
~~share some greased tea with me~~
General Philosophy
Discuss This...
The Acropolis
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks